On the Problem of Understanding in Physics

Authors: Chelnokov M.B. Published: 08.02.2015
Published in issue: #1(58)/2015  
DOI: 10.18698/1812-3368-2015-1-76-83

Category: Physics  
Keywords: fundamental particles, determinism, probability, reason, consequence, primary objects, space, time

In this article the problem of understanding in physics is considered. Until the early twentieth century world view is represented by purely mechanistic and an explanation of any phenomenon was solved to a visual image. But with the advent of quantum mechanics visual representations largely disappeared. Thus the problem of understanding become aggravated sharply. In this paper, we have separated the basic physical concepts of primary and secondary. Two aspects of the definition of primary concepts as the operational and the intuitive ones are considered. Particular attention is given to the physics of the microworld. It has been considered a combination of deterministic and probabilistic pattern at this level. The concept of probabilistic determinism was introduced. In this article there is an analysis of not material, not physical, but the pure mathematical nature for de Broglie wave and probability waves. Perhaps, this is a fundamentally new type object, on that so far little attention was paid. Interpretation of all these aspects is based on the fundamental experiment for diffraction of alternately flying electrons carried out by V.A. Fabrikant in 1949 year.


[1] Kanke V.A. Filosofiya [Philosophy]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2004. 180 p.

[2] Biberman L.M., Sushkin N.G., Fabrikant V.A. Diffraction of alternately flying electrons. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR [Proc. Acad. Sci. USSR], 1949, vol. 66, p. 185 (in Russ.).

[3] Myakishev G.Ya. Dinamicheskie i statisticheskie zakonomernosti v fizike [Dynamical and statistical laws in physics]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1973. 272 p.

[4] Chelnokov M.B. Determinism and probability as the fundamental basses of nature. Vestn. Mosk. Gos. Tekh. Univ. im. N.E. Baumana, Estestv. Nauki [Herald of the Bauman Moscow State Tech. Univ., Nat. Sci.], 2012, no. 4, pp. 33-43 (in Russ.).

[5] Bohm D.J. Causality and chance in modern physics. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd, 1957. (Russ. ed.: Bom D. Prichinnost’ i sluchaynost’ v sovremennoy fizike. Moscow, IL Publ., 1959, p. 111.).

[6] Terletskiy Ya.P. Dinamicheskie i statisticheskie zakony fiziki [Dynamical and statistical laws of physics]. Moscow, MGU Publ., 1950. 98 p. (p. 73).

[7] Davydov B.I. The answer to J.P. Terletskiy objections. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. [J. Exp. Theor. Phys.], 1949, vol. 17, p. 485 (in Russ.).

[8] Heisenberg W. Die physikalischen Prinzipien der Quntentheorie. Stuttgart, Hirzel, 1930. (Russ. ed.: Geyzenberg V. Fizicheskie printsipy kvantovoy teorii. Moscow, Gostekhizdat Publ., 1932, p. 78. Eng. ed.: Heisenberg W. The physical principles of the quantum theory. Courier Dover Publications, 1930. 183 p.).

[9] Heisenberg W. Physics and philosophy. New York, Harper & Row, 1958. (Russ. ed.: Geyzenberg V. Fizika i filosofiya. Moscow, IL Publ., 1963, p. 52.).

[10] Geyzenberg V. Filosofskie problemy atomnoy fiziki [Philosophical problems of atomic physics]. Moscow, IL Publ., 1953, p. 8.