Non-Stationarity Effects in Polymer Membrane Swelling as Studied by Infrared Fourier Spectrometry Technique

Abstract

Nafion polymer membrane swelling mode in water poured into a cuvette, the cuvette characteristic size of the order of the membrane thickness, was investigated experimentally using the infrared Fourier spectrometry. Interest in these studies is based on the fact that, when a Nafion membrane is swelling in a cuvette sized much larger than the membrane thickness, polymer fibers are effectively unwinding into the water volume. However, this process was not studied in the case, where the area that could be occupied by the unwound polymer is limited by the cuvette size. It was shown that temporal dynamics of the polymer transition from a hydrophobic state to the hydrophilic state had several specific features depending on the cuvette size, isotopic composition, ion content and water pretreatment. It was suggested that dynamics of the cavity formation and collapse should be influenced by the dissolved gas nanobubbles. Indeed, the investigated liquid samples were not degassed. When polymer fibers are unwound, protrusions and irregularities appear on the hydrophobic membrane surface playing the role of nucleation centers for the surface nanobubbles. These nanobubbles are "carried away" by the growing fibers towards the cuvette window, and coalescence (collapse) of the nanobubbles could occur in the area of arising mechanical stresses, which should contribute to formation of a cavity. This is indirectly confirmed by results obtained in this work

This work was supported by a grant from the President of the Russian Federation to support young Russian scientists (MD-2128.2020.11)

Please cite this article as:

Bunkin N.F., Bashkin S.V., Gudkov S.V., et al. Non-stationarity effects in polymer membrane swelling as studied by infrared Fourier spectrometry technique. Herald of the Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Series Natural Sciences, 2022, no. 1 (100), pp. 122--140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18698/1812-3368-2022-1-122-140

References

[1] Mauritz K.A., Moore R.B. State of understanding of Nafion. Chem. Rev., 2004, vol. 104, no. 10, pp. 4535--4586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0207123

[2] Liu L., Chen W., Li Y. An overview of the proton conductivity of Nafion membranes through a statistical analysis. J. Membr. Sci., 2016, vol. 504, pp. 1--9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.12.065

[3] Wang Y., Chen K.S., Mishler J., et al. A review of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells: technology, applications, and needs on fundamental research. Appl. Energy., 2011, vol. 88, iss. 4, pp. 981--1007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.09.030

[4] Pollack G.H. The fourth phase of water. Ebner and Sons, 2013.

[5] Ninham B.W., Lo Nostro P. Molecular forces and self assembly in colloid, nano sciences and biology. Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010.

[6] Bunkin N.F., Lyakhov G.A., Kozlov V.A., et al. Time dependence of the luminescence from a polymer membrane swollen in water: concentration and isotopic effects. Phys. Wave Phen., 2017, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 259--271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1541308X17040045

[7] Bunkin N.F., Shkirin A.V., Kozlov V.A., et al. Near-surface structure of Nafion in deuterated water. J. Chem. Phys., 2018, vol. 149, iss. 16, art. 164901. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5042065

[8] Craig H. Standard reporting concentrations of Deuterium and Oxygen 18 in natural water. Science, 1961, vol. 133, no. 3467, pp. 1833--1834. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.133.3467.1833

[9] Workman Jr.J., Weyer L. Practical guide and spectral atlas for interpretive near-infrared spectroscopy. CRC Press, 2013.

[10] Bunkin N.F., Balashov A.A., Shkirin A.V., et al. Investigation of deuterium substitution effects in a polymer membrane using IR Fourier spectrometry. Opt. Spectrosc., 2018, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 337--342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0030400X18090072

[11] Bunkin N.F., Kozlov V.A., Shkirin A.V., et al. Dynamics of Nafion membrane swelling in H2O/D2O mixtures as studied using FTIR technique. J. Chem. Phys., 2018, vol. 148, iss. 12, art. 124901. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5022264

[12] Bunkin N.F., Bunkin F.V. Bubston structure of water and electrolyte aqueous solutions. Phys.-Usp., 2016, vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 846--865. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3367/UFNe.2016.05.037796

[13] Bunkin N.F., Shkirin A.V., Suyazov N.V., et al. Formation and dynamics of ion-stabilized gas nanobubble phase in the bulk of aqueous NaCl solutions. J. Phys. Chem. B, 2016, vol. 120, no. 7, pp. 1291--1303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b11103

[14] Yurchenko S.O., Shkirin A.V., Ninham B.W., et al. Ion-specific and thermal effects in the stabilization of the gas nanobubble phase in bulk aqueous electrolyte solutions. Langmuir, 2016, vol. 32, iss. 43, pp. 11245--11255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b01644

[15] Lobyshev V.I., Tomkevich M.S., Petrushanko I.Yu. Experimental study of potentiated aqueous solutions. Biophysics, 2005, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 416--420.

[16] Barkhudarov E.M., Kossyi I.A., Anpilov A.M., et al. New nanostructured carbon coating inhibits bacterial growth, but does not influence on animal cells. Nanomaterials, 2020, vol. 10, iss. 11, pp. 1--12.

[17] Bunkin N.F., Shkirin A.V., Ninham B.W., et al. Shaking-induced aggregation and flotation in immunoglobulin dispersions: differences between water and water--ethanol mixtures. ACS Omega, 2020, vol. 5, iss. 24, pp. 14689--14701. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c01444

[18] Furst E.M., Squires T.M. Microrheology. Oxford Univ. Press, 2017.

[19] Gebel G. Structural evolution of water swollen perfluorosulfonated ionomers from dry membrane to solution. Polymer, 2000, vol. 41, iss. 15, pp. 5829--5838. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00770-3

[20] Alheshibri M., Qian J., Jehannin M., et al. A history of nanobubbles. Langmuir, 2016, vol. 32, iss. 43, pp. 11086--11100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b02489