Background Image
Previous Page  8 / 15 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 8 / 15 Next Page
Page Background

Let us prove that the parameter

c

∗

∈

R

ρ

exists, and the solution

η

(

t, c

)

of Cauchy problem (17) satisfies the condition

η

(

t

∗

, c

∗

) =

η

∗

. If

b

i

(

t

)

,

d

i

(

t

)

∈

C

r

i

([0

, t

∗

])

,

i

= 1

, m

, and

q

(

z

1

, . . . , z

m

, η

)

∈

C

∞

(

R

n

)

, then the

vector-function

η

(

t, c

)

is differentiable using the parameter

c

, while the

matrix function

ν

=

∂η/∂c

satisfies the system of equations (13):

˙

ν

=

Kν

+

r

X

i

=1

A

i

+

∂p

∂z

i

d

(

i

−

1)

(

t

);

ν

(0) = 0

,

(18)

which is obtained as the result of system (17) differentiation with the

parameter

c

.

Now we introduce the mapping

Ψ :

R

ρ

→

R

ρ

, which assigns to

each parameter

c

∈

R

ρ

, the value

η

(

t

∗

, c

)

∈

R

ρ

of the

η

(

t, c

)

solution

of Cauchy problem (17) at a moment of time

t

∗

. Let us show that while

satisfying the theorem’s conditions, there exists the parameter

c

∗

, for which

the equality

Ψ(

c

∗

) =

η

∗

is fulfilled. For this, we will introduce the mapping

v

:

R

ρ

→

R

ρ

, functioning according to the rule

v

(

c

) =

c

−

M

−

1

(Ψ(

c

)

−

η

∗

)

.

The equality

Ψ(

c

∗

) =

η

∗

is equivalent to the fact that the parameter

c

∗

is a fixed point of the mapping

v

. To prove the existence of the fixed point

in the mapping

v

, we prove that the mapping

v

is compressing. The Jacobi

matrix of the mapping

v

has a form of

v

0

(

c

) =

E

−

M

−

1

Ψ

0

(

c

)

, where

E

is a

unity

ρ

×

ρ

-matrix;

Ψ

0

(

c

)

is the Jacobi matrix of the mapping

Ψ

. According

to the definition of the mapping

Ψ

,

Ψ

0

(

c

) =

ν

(

t

∗

)

, then

v

0

(

c

) =

E

−

M

−

1

ν

(

t

∗

)

.

Let us denote

D

(

t

) =

t

Z

0

d

(

τ

)

dτ

. The choice of the functions

d

(

t

)

in

formula (9) ensures that with

t

∈

[0

, t

∗

]

both the inequality

0

6

D

(

t

)

6

1

and

the equality

D

(

t

∗

) = 1

are fulfilled. Let us consider the matrix function

W

(

t

) =

D

(

t

)

E

+

r

−

1

X

i

=1

d

(

i

−

1)

(

t

)

N

i

−

M

−

1

ν

(

t

)

,

(19)

here

N

i

is

ρ

×

ρ

-matrices, which will be chosen later. From the equations

D

(0) = 0

,

d

(0) = 0

,

. . .

,

d

(

r

−

2)

(0) = 0

,

ν

(0) = 0

, it follows that

W

(0) = 0

,

and from the equations

D

(

t

∗

) = 1

,

d

(

t

∗

) = 0

, . . . , d

(

r

−

2)

(

t

∗

) = 0

—

W

(

t

∗

) =

E

−

M

−

1

ν

(

t

∗

)

. Having shown that

k

W

(

t

∗

)

k

6

γ <

1

, thereby

ISSN 1812-3368. Herald of the BMSTU. Series “Natural Sciences”. 2014. No. 5

23