On Lipm- and Cm-Reflection of Harmonic Functions with Respect to Boundaries of Caratheodory Domains in R2
Authors: Paramonov P.V. | Published: 01.08.2018 |
Published in issue: #4(79)/2018 | |
DOI: 10.18698/1812-3368-2018-4-36-45 | |
Category: Mathematics and Mechanics | Chapter: Substantial Analysis, Complex and Functional Analysis | |
Keywords: Caratheodory domain, Poisson operator, harmonic measure, harmonic reflection operator, Lipschitz — Hölder space, Carathéodory domain, Lipschitz — Hölder space |
In this paper a number of sharp necessary and sufficient conditions for Lipm- and Cm-continuity of operators of harmonic reflection of functions over boundaries of simple Caratheodory domains in R2 are obtained. Let us state the main result of this paper in a simplified form. For an arbitrary real function f that is harmonic in a Jordan domain and continuous in its closure, let R(f) be the solution of the Dirichlet problem in the domain Ω with the boundary function f|∂Ω, where ∂Ω is the boundary of Ω. The function R(f) is said to be a harmonic reflection of the function f with respect to the boundary ∂D = ∂Ω of the domain D, and the operator R: f — R(f) is said to be a harmonic reflection operator. Let now D has a piecewise smooth boundary, and suppose πα ∈ (0,π] to be the value of the minimal inner angle of the domain D (it means that πα is the minimal value among all inner angles Va, a∈∂D, formed by couples of distinct rays tangent to ∂D with vertexes at a). Let mα = 1/(2-α). Then for all (m,m’) such that 0 < m’ < mα or 0 < m’ < mα ≤ m ≤ 1 the operator R is (m, m’)-continuous, and it is not the case for mα < m’ ≤ m ≤ 1. The (m, m’)-continuity property means that for any function f harmonic in D we have R(f) ∈ Lipm (Ω). Moreover, the Lipm (Ω)-norm of R(f) has to be estimated (up to certain multiplicative constant) by the Lipm (D)-norm of f
The work was carried out with the state financial support of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (project no. 1.3843.2017/4.6)
References
[1] Lebesgue H. Sur le probleme de Dirichlet. Rend. Circ. Mat. di Palermo, 1907, vol. 29, pp. 371−402.
[2] Paramonov P.V. C1-extension and C1-reflection of subharmonic functions from Lyapunov — Dini domains into RN. Sb. Math., 2008, vol. 199, no. 12, pp. 1809–1846. DOI: 10.1070/SM2008v199n12ABEH003982
[3] Warschawski S.E. On the differentiability at the boundary in conformal mapping. Amer. Math. Soc. Proceedings, 1961, vol. 12, pp. 614−620.
[4] Pommerenke C. Boundary behavior of conformal maps. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1992. 300 p.
[5] Johnston E.H. The boundary modulus of continuity of harmonic functions. Pacific J. Math., 1980, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 87−98.
[6] Beurling A. Etudes sur un Probleme de Majoration. Upsala, Almquist and Wiksell. 1933. 109 p.
[7] Goluzin G.M. Geometricheskaya teoriya funkcii kompleksnogo peremennogo [Geometric theory of functions of a complex variable]. Moscow, Ripol Klassik Publ., 2013. 628 p.
[8] Landkof N.S. Osnovy sovremennoy teorii potenciala [Fundamentals of modern theory of potential]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1966. 515 p.
[9] Paramonov P.V. Cm-approximations by harmonic polynomials on compact sets in RN. Russian Acad. Sci. Sb. Math., 1994, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 231–251. DOI: 10.1070/SM1994v078n01ABEH003467
[10] Hinkkanen A. Modulus of continuity of harmonic functions. Journal D Analyse Mathematique, 1988, vol. 51, pp. 1−29. DOI: 10.1007/BF02791117.pdf