Previous Page  6 / 8 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 6 / 8 Next Page
Page Background

B.N. Korobets

140

ISSN 1812-3368. Вестник МГТУ им. Н.Э. Баумана. Сер. Естественные науки. 2016. № 6

The results (combined project III) are summarised below:

Option …….

0

1

2

3

4

5

Costs ………

0

4

6

9

10

15

RL ………….

0

7

8

12

15

20

Step 4.

Take combined projects I and III. The solution is given in the Table 4.

Table 4

The solution

2

(7; 13) (11; 20) (13; 21) (16; 25)

1

(3; 7)

(7; 14)

(9; 15) (12; 19) (13; 22) (18; 27)

0

0

(4; 7)

(6; 8)

(9; 12) (10; 15) (15; 20)

I / III

0

1

2

3

4

5

In the Table 4, find a box with the lowest first number out of the boxes where the

second number is higher than, or equal to,

2

25.

 

It is box (16; 25) with costs equal

to 16; accordingly,

s

3

= 16.

To determine

s

2

, find a box with the lowest first number out of the boxes where

the second number is higher than, or equal to,

1

15.

 

It is box (9; 15) with costs

equal to

s

2

= 9.

Find the solutions, i. e. the eligible projects, using the backward algorithm [10].

Box (16; 25) corresponds to option 2 in the combined project I Table 4, i. e. inclusion

of projects 1 and 2 into the programme, and option 3 of the combined project III

table 4. Option 3 of the combined project III Table 4 corresponds to option 2 of the

combined project II Table 3, i. e. inclusion of projects 3 and 4 into the programme.

Therefore, to achieve score 3, we need to include projects 1, 2, 3 and 4 in the pro-

gramme.

Do the same to determine the eligible projects to get score 2. Box (9; 15) cor-

responds to option 1 of the combined project I table 4, i. e. inclusion of project 1 into

the programme, and option 2 of the combined project III Table 4, i. e. inclusion of

project 5 into the programme.

Stage II.

By solving

m

problems of Stage I, we got a table of minimum costs (

s

ij

)

required to achieve (maintain) comprehensive scores 1, 2 and 3 (Table 5). Since po-

tential approaches to solving Stage II problems are mentioned in [11], we would only

discuss one of the options through the example of a comprehensive scoring system

from Fig. 2.

Table 5

A table of minimum costs

s

ij

j

i

1

2

3

4

1

5

4

7

3

2

16

10

13

9

3

25

20

21

18