Previous Page  12 / 17 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 12 / 17 Next Page
Page Background

A New Look at Fundamentals of the Photometric Light Transport and Scattering Theory

ISSN 1812-3368. Вестник МГТУ им. Н.Э. Баумана. Сер. Естественные науки. 2017. № 5

89

probability of transitions became quasi-discontinuous, and the possibility to replace

them by the test number

n

(or

m

,

l

, etc.) appears. In such approach the common

probability of the ''photon'' transition —

p

(

n

,

x

k

|l

,

x

i

) — from

x

i

point to

x

k

point obeys

the general Markov equation [16]:

( ,

, )

( ,

, ) ( ,

, ),

.

k i

k

j

j

i

j

p n x l x

p n x m x p m x l x l m n

 

(28)

For the homogeneous Markov chain all probabilities of the transitions using ''

s

'' steps

(

s = n – l

) form a matrix of probabilities:

(

, )

( ),

k

i

ik

p x s x

s

p

(29)

herewith, if

N

is a total number of chain's states which are taken into account, the sum

of all matrix elements obeys the closing equation:

1

1.

N

ik

k

p

(30)

The equation (29) shows that probabilities of transitions with the use of any ''

s

'' steps

can be ultimately represented using only one-step probabilities. In fact, it reduces the

solution of the Markov process problem to forming one-step matrixes and making the

formal multiplications of them.

Because of

R

1 in our scattering model, reflectivity

R

can be interpreted as a

probability of the ''photon'' transition from one state to another when it is reflected by

a heterogeneity

r

i

, whilst the probability of the opposite event for the ''photon''

(crossing the heterogeneity

r

i

) will be equal 1

− R

. For the correct usage of the Markov

processes mathematical formalism, it is necessary to enumerate all states of ''photons''.

Consider

N

heterogeneities

r

i

inside Δ

x

. If the simplest enumeration is chosen: before

all

r

i

(before Δ

x

) there is the state number

i

= 1, between

r

1

and

r

2

— the state number

i

= 2, between

r

2

and

r

3

the state number

i

= 3, etc., then one can determine all

one-step probabilities for the ''photon'' migration. Excluding states

i

= 1 and

i

=

N

+1

(after

r

N

), the transition from any

i

-th state to the state

i

=

i +

1 or

i

=

i −

1 has the

probability 1 −

R

. The probability of staying in the state

i

is

R

(the case of back-

reflection in

i

-th state). If ''photon'' goes out of the Δ

x

(

i

= 1 or

i

=

N

+ 1), the

probability of next changing its state falls down to zero. But for this simplest

enumeration approach, the Markovian properties of the process are violated: the

transition from

i

-th state to

i +

1 or

i −

1 states depends on the prehistory of the

''photon'' traveling (was the ''photon'' moved from left to right or from right to left).

Therefore, the problem cannot be resolved using the formalism of Markov processes.

To overcome this difficulty, we offered to consider the much more useful

enumerating approach. The even numbers (

i

= 2, 4, 6, …) we will use for the

enumeration of the ''photon'' states between

r

i

and out of them when ''photon'' travels

from right to left. The uneven (odd) numbers (

i

= 1, 3, 5, …) we will use when a