Background Image
Previous Page  13 / 23 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 13 / 23 Next Page
Page Background

U

Ω

+

such that the above inequalities are satisfied for all solutions to

(13) with initial data

a

0

U.

Hence,

|

ξ

i

(

a

0

)

x

i

|

< ε.

Continuity of

ξ

i

at

a

Ω

+

with

a

i

>

0

is proved.

In the same way it is proved at

a

Ω

+

with

a

i

<

0

.

Since

a

i

6

= 0

if

a

K

j

, i

6

=

j,

we have proved continuity of the restriction

ξ

i

|

K

j

in the

case

i

6

=

j.

As for

ξ

i

|

K

i

,

note that between two zeros of

y

(

i

)

(

x

)

there exists a zero

x

j

of another derivative

y

(

j

)

(

x

)

.

The values

y

(

m

)

(

x

j

)

, m

= 0

,

1

,

2

,

3

,

due to

continuity of

ξ

j

|

K

i

,

depend continuously on

a

K

i

,

whereas the restriction

ξ

i

|

K

j

depends continuously on these values. This proves continuity of the

restriction

ξ

i

|

K

i

.

I

Lemma 8.

For any

k >

1

there exist

Q > q >

1

such that for any

typical solution

y

(

x

)

to equation

(1)

the values of all expressions

y

(

x

000

j

+1

)

y

(

x

0

j

)

1

4

,

y

(

x

00

j

)

y

(

x

000

j

)

1

4

,

y

(

x

0

j

)

y

(

x

00

j

)

1

4

,

y

0

(

x

j

)

y

0

(

x

00

j

)

1

k

+3

,

y

0

(

x

000

j

+1

)

y

0

(

x

j

)

1

k

+3

,

y

0

(

x

00

j

)

y

0

(

x

000

j

)

1

k

+3

,

y

00

(

x

0

j

)

y

00

(

x

000

j

)

1

2

k

+2

,

y

00

(

x

j

)

y

00

(

x

0

j

)

1

2

k

+2

,

y

00

(

x

000

j

+1

)

y

00

(

x

j

)

1

2

k

+2

,

y

000

(

x

00

j

+1

)

y

000

(

x

j

)

1

3

k

+1

,

y

000

(

x

0

j

)

y

000

(

x

j

)

1

3

k

+1

,

y

000

(

x

j

)

y

000

(

x

0

j

)

1

3

k

+1

with sufficiently large

j

are contained in the segment

[

q, Q

]

.

J

Let us define the continuous functions

ψ

ijl

:

K

i

R

(all indices

i, j, l

are from 0 to 3 and pairwise different) taking each point

a

K

i

to the ratio of the absolute values of the

j

-th derivative of the solution

y

(

x

)

to (13) at 0 and at the next point where the

l

-th derivative vanishes,

i.e.

ψ

ijl

(

a

) =

a

j

y

(

j

)

(

ξ

l

(

a

))

(both the numerator and the denominator are

non-zero if

a

K

i

).

Due to Lemma 6, each function

ψ

ijl

at all points of the compact set

K

i

is positive and less than 1. Hence

0

<

inf

K

i

ψ

ijl

(

a

)

sup

K

i

ψ

ijl

(

a

)

<

1

.

Now consider an arbitrary typical solution

y

(

x

)

to (1) and two its nodes,

say

x

0

j

and

x

000

j

+1

,

with sufficiently large numbers such that the related points

in

S

3

belong to

Ω

1

+

.

In this case we can choose constants

A

6

= 0

and

B >

0

such that the function

z

(

x

) =

Ay

(

Bx

+

x

0

j

)

is a solution to (13) with

a

K

1

.

Indeed, this is equivalent to existence of

A

6

= 0

and

B >

0

such

ISSN 1812-3368. Вестник МГТУ им. Н.Э. Баумана. Сер. “Естественные науки”. 2015. № 2

15