Previous Page  12 / 13 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 12 / 13 Next Page
Page Background

В.Н. Бурков, Б.Н. Коробец, В.А. Минаев

116

ISSN 1812-3368. Вестник МГТУ им. Н.Э. Баумана. Сер. Естественные науки. 2017. № 2

Просьба ссылаться на эту статью следующим образом:

Бурков В.Н., Коробец Б.Н., Минаев В.А., Щепкин А.В. Механизмы экспертной оценки

военно-технологических программ // Вестник МГТУ им. Н.Э. Баумана. Сер. Естествен-

ные науки. 2017. № 2. C. 105–117. DOI: 10.18698/1812-3368-2017-2-105-117

MECHANISMS OF MILITARY AND TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRAMS

EXPERT ASSESSMENT

V.N. Burkov

1

vlab17@bk.ru

B.N. Korobets

2

korobetz@bmstu.ru

V.A. Minaev

2

m1va@yandex.ru

A.V. Shchepkin

1

av_shch@mail.ru

1

V.A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences,

Moscow, Russian Federation

2

Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow, Russian Federation

Abstract

Keywords

The paper shows that the success of the military-technological

program (MTP) is largely dependent on its assessment mecha-

nisms operating both at the program development stage, and at the

program implementation stage. The study briefly describes basic

mechanisms used in assessment of the MTP development and

gives a detailed analysis of the MTP expert mechanisms. In our

research we developed the MTP variants characterized by the

requirement of non-manipulability, reflecting the interest of the

governing bodies in having reliable and objective information.

Findings of the research show that the problem of correct organi-

zation of the MTP examination is effectively solved within the

framework of the active systems theory. In this case, the Centre

organizes the MTP examination in order to obtain the most accu-

rate and objective assessment, and experts being active elements of

the examination process may choose a strategy of their own beha-

vior so that the final expert assessment would be the most appro-

priate to their interests. We formalized the experts' basic functions

and objectives, as well as the conditions which if fulfilled lead to

determining the resulting assessment, reflecting the experts' shared

opinion. This could be done in the case of Nash equilibrium and

according to reliable evaluation of experts findings. The study

proved that the resultant expert assessment of any expert coincides

with their true MTP assessment. The expert's own opinion on the

program project does not play any role in determining their rating.

The study shows that it is reasonable for the Centre to choose the

strategy, so that MPT examination takes into consideration two

extreme situations in the expert's behavior — the desire to defend

their views and not to lower their rating

Military-technology program,

mechanisms of expert assess-

ment, active systems, Nash

equilibrium, expert rating,

shared opinion

REFERENCES

[1] Burkov V.N., Zalozhnev

A.Yu

., Leont'yev S.V., Novikov D.A. Mekhanizmy finansirovaniya

programm regional'nogo razvitiya [Funding vehicle of regional development program]. Mos-

cow, ICS RAS Publ., 2002. 54 p.